Five Years Until Scap Report Sees Daylight

Sometimes you have got to admire the bare-cheeked audacity of the British establishment when it comes to dealing with scandals that threaten their own.

A classic example has presented itself in the shape of the Boutcher inquiry into Freddie Scappaticci and his handlers. The scandal is so huge, affecting not just British military intelligence, who ran Scap, but also MI5 and the former RUC Special Branch, who both shared his intelligence, especially MI5, and via the Tactical Co-ordinating Group structure (TCG), helped run him.

All three branches of British intelligence are thus implicated in the central allegation, viz that Scappaticci was allowed to kill by his handlers to preserve his cover and his immense value to the British government in its war against the IRA.

So serious is the allegation, implicating the State in murder, that it can’t entirely be brushed under the carpet. The classic British response in these situations is to set up an inquiry headed by a safe pair of hands. They don’t always pick the right guy, e.g. John Stalker, but one can only assume they have done their homework on Mr Boutcher.

So, now, no-one can criticise the British for not doing anything about the Scappaticci scandal. But the the truth is that we are very unlikely ever to see the full report, which will be said to be so sensitive that its contents won’t be divulged. We’ll be lucky even to see a short, sanitised summary.

That’s what happened to the Stalker report, to the Sampson report which took over from Stalker when Jack Hermon nobbled him, and it is what has happened to the various Steven’s reports, although we did get one half-decent summary from Stevens.

So a secret inquiry, held in private will produce a report which we’ll never get to read but the British will be able to say that they did something about the Scappaticci scandal.

There’s a kicker though, Apparently the PSNI and/or John Boutcher are briefing that his report will take five years to produce. That’s nearly as long as World War II.

By 2021 or even 2022, Scappaticci will be a distant memory. The man himself may even have departed for the big Internal Security Unit in the sky by then. The odds are that many people won’t care a toss about Scap by that time.

But the British will be able to say that they did something about the scandal.

5 responses to “Five Years Until Scap Report Sees Daylight

  1. Another great example of “the bare-cheeked audacity of the British establishment” was seen this week.

    The lead item on BBC News on Thursday this week was the visit of former prime ministers Major and Blair to Derry to tell people how to vote in the EU in the forthcoming Brexit referendum.

    The second item on the evening news that day was the news that nobody would be prosecuted over the rendition of suspected Islamists (and their families) to Ghaddafi’s Libya by MI6 when Mr Blair was prime minister.

    The fourth item on the evening news was the Police Ombudsman’s (second!) report into the murder of six people at Loughinisland in 1994. This report established RUC collusion with the murderers at a time when Mr Major was prime minister.

    The interesting aspect is that nobody in the public arena seems to have joined these dots. Instead Messrs Major and Blair were allowed to appear as genial grandads offering some avuncular advice on a matter of major political controversy without being molested by awkward questions over state collusion in acts of terror during respective their terms of office.

  2. Is there a book out yet on this subject??

  3. I am surprised (not a lot) a law firm like KRW let the British off the hook. A number of families of Scap’s victims have said that Scap ‘liased’ with them in some detail in the aftermath of the murder of their loved ones. That, to me, could take on the realm of being prime facie evidence and, at least, be enough to trigger a new police murder investigation; and any such inquiry as the Boucher inquiry, like the Kingsmills inquest inquiry, would have to be put on hold until the completion of a criminal investigation. Such a scenario may have resulted in Scap being swiftly brought back here to answer the allegations made by the families.

  4. It’s all down the ‘memory hole,’ along with the Gibson Report into torture/rendition, recetnly closed down by the DPP and placed under the aegis of the venal ‘Intelligence and Security Committee’ of Parliament.

Leave a Reply to The Broken Elbow Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.