Jean McConville And That British Army Radio – New Evidence Emerges

By Ed Moloney & James Kinchin-White

There are three ways the late Jean McConville can be viewed, aside from the fact that her murder by the IRA and the forced orphaning of her children was unjustifiable by any standard.

One is that she was a complete innocent, picked on by the IRA in Divis Flats and framed as an informer because she was an outsider, an East Belfast Protestant whose Catholic husband was no longer alive to protect her. Someone who shouldn’t be allowed to live in Divis Flats. A victim of bigotry, essentially.

Another is that she was a low level informer who was in the pay of the British Army to pass on tittle tattle about her neighbours at a time when the appetite of the British intelligence machine for any scrap of information that could lead them to IRA activists, no matter how small, was insatiable.

There is a third view which is that Jean McConville is a commodity whose value to a range of people, from book publishers to propagandists, from politicians to prelates, depends largely upon which of the two explanations above the writer favours.

There can be no doubt that the first explanation of the Jean McConville killing helps to define Patrick Keefe’s best-selling, award winning account of the widow’s death. His book, ‘Say Nothing‘ dwells heavily on that version of her death; the foundation stone is that the widowed mother-of-ten was brutally murdered by the IRA for reasons not based on the truth of the informer charge.

It is no exaggeration to say that had Keefe accepted the IRA’s version, that she was an informer, no publisher would have bought the book, there would have been no plaudits, no glittering prizes, no praise. But he wrote the book that would not only be commercially successful but augment his standing among his peers at The New Yorker and in the profession at large.

There are nods in the book in the other direction, such as his use of a photograph – which co-author of this article James Kinchin-White discovered – of a British soldier on patrol in Divis Flats using a Stornophone radio, the exact type of phone which IRA sources, including the late commander of the IRA in the area, Brendan Hughes, told me was given to Jean McConville by her military handlers.

But he does not dwell on that, instead giving space to a former RUC Special Branch (political police) officer who denied that such radios were in military service in December 1972, when Jean McConville was abducted, killed and buried in a secret grave.

I provided him with documentary evidence to the contrary which he chose to ignore. The most significant piece of corroboration appeared in the published report of the British government inquiry, headed by Lord Saville, into the so-called Bloody Sunday massacre of civilian protesters by British paratroopers in Derry on a day in January 1972 that came to be known as ‘Bloody Sunday’:

We should also record that there is evidence that before Bloody Sunday some of the resident battalions were, at platoon level only, using Stornophone radios in place of Larkspur radios. A number of former soldiers serving in Londonderry recalled having Stornophone radios available on 30th January, 1972. Often nicknamed ‘Stornos’, these radios, like the Pye radios discussed above, were a commercially produced system purchased by the Army.

Another, equally compelling piece of evidence came in the form of a memoir written by a former British soldier, Harry Beaves, who was stationed in Casement Park in the summer of 1972, in the wake of Operation Motorman. The memoir was published nine months before ‘Say Nothing’ was published but was apparently missed by the author.

Beaves wrote, inter alia: The delight of Northern Ireland was that we were able to use Stornophone handsets similar to those used by the emergency services. The set was small enough to fit into the breast pocket of a combat jacket and had fixed frequencies that required no tuning, so that each (patrol) commander was able to carry his own radio without the need for a dedicated signaller.

But there is more. Diligent research by James Kinchin White has discovered a number of photographs of British soldiers using Stornophones or Stornophone-type radios months before Jean McConville was abducted. The case that small, hand-held radios were being used by the British Army at this time is overwhelming and undeniable.

Here are the photos: The first two, from the Alamy Database show the aftermath of a riot, apparently in 1971. Two young men have been arrested while a bespectacled soldier, possibly an officer, is using/holding a Stornophone-type radio.

This next photograph is of a member of the Royal Green Jackets, the British Army’s premier regiment and he is also clearly using a Stornophone radio. The location appears to be Rossville Flats in Derry and it is possible to date the photo to, at the latest, November 1972, the last occasion on which any of the three RGJ battalions served in either Derry or the lower Falls.

This next photo, which comes from the photographic site of the First Battalion Royal Green Jackets, can be dated, at the very latest, to the end of November 1972, although a caption dates it to 1971. The reason it can be dated to 1972 is because that was the year when the Stornophone was gradually phased out for military use and replaced by the Pye Pocketphone, a radio which was also used by the RUC. The soldier on the left is equipped with the Pye radio.

Finally, there is this potted history of the use of the Pye radio in Northern Ireland which can be found here, on the official site of the Royal Signals Regiment, which provides the British Army with communication systems. The Pye radio replaced the Stornophone, meaning not least that there was a stockpile of unused Stornophones in military bases throughout Northern Ireland which could be put to other uses. The argument that by 1971/72 the British Army was using small, hand-held radios of one sort or another is overwhelming.

Patrick Keefe, author of the prize winning account of Jean McConville’s killing, ‘Say Nothing’

So, there is an overwhelming abundance of evidence that small hand held radios, of the sort that IRA leaders such as Brendan Hughes maintained was found in Jean McConville’s Divis flat, had been issued to British troops serving in Northern Ireland in 1971 and 1972, before the mother-of-ten was abducted and disappeared by the IRA.

It was not difficult to find the evidence we have presented in this article, but Patrick Keefe was either unable or unwilling to find it and when proof that the radios were in use in 1972 was given to him by others he opted either for selective publication – for example his decision to ignore the Saville report’s reference to the use of Stornophones on Bloody Sunday by troops – and to give as much weight or more to sceptics, such as the former RUC Special Branch officer he was put in touch with who told him there were no such radios in Belfast at that time.

That former policeman must have known he was not telling the truth, so why did he do that? One inescapable motive was to register a win in the unending propaganda war between the IRA and the State, to undermine the IRA’s claim that Jean McConville was an informer and to establish that the widowed mother-of-ten was really an innocent whose life was taken because she was an outsider and a Protestant to boot, not because she worked for an agency not that different from his own Special Branch. Undermining the IRA’s claim that she used an Army radio to facilitate her informing activities suggests she was not an informer, that the IRA was lying.

Patrick Keefe implicitly presents the reader with a conclusion that ‘the radio may have existed but probably didn’t’. He calls it ‘The Mystery Radio’. But such radios were not ‘mysteries’ in the Belfast of 1972. In fact they appear to have been commonplace. His further claim that it would have been impossible to use such a radio without being overheard by neighbours, tells the reader that here is someone who has never experienced the incessant noise of working class developments like Divis, much less the huge Divis complex of the early 1970’s before much of it was demolished.

So, why did Keefe discount or ignore evidence that radios of the sort the IRA claimed was used were commonplace in 1972 when Jean McConville was abducted and then disappeared? The unavoidable answer is that it made for a better story, one in which evil triumphs over good but is eventually brought to book by a determined and skillful investigator. What followed were plaudits and prizes.

11 responses to “Jean McConville And That British Army Radio – New Evidence Emerges

  1. the radios were in use by the british army, so de facto mrs mcconville was an informer, if hughes et al were telling the truth why not produce the radio at the time of the murder & out her as a tout?

    why because there is no evidence against mcconville except she helped an injured soldier & was lined up to be murdered

    • No, it does not mean she was an informer at all, and we do not say that. What it does is undermine completely claims by state agencies that such radios were not in service at the time of her death, such as the claim in Patrick Keefe’s book from an RUC Special Branch veteran that they were not being used in 1972 and that therefore the IRA’s claim that she was using such a phone to communicate with her handler was bogus. The evidence we have produced shows clearly that such radios were widely available to the security forces in 1972.

    • I just finished Say Nothing. I thought it was good, not perfect. But well researched. If I may, with all due respect, perhaps Keefe did not find the evidence submitted compelling. The gap(s) between that type of radio being used by the British Army in Northern Ireland, and concluding that Ms. McConville had one is too great a gap.
      The radio’s own literature says above, that the radio was not secure – basically a handheld CB radio that I am sure the IRA was smart enough to buy one themselves (or grab one off of a Brit Army guy) and monitor the frequencies used. The voice of a woman on a British Army band would have stood out. If Ms. McConville had a radio, it was not the one discussed.
      That said, if I was IRA, and yanked a Tout out of her flat, I’d grab the radio too and throw it in the grave with the Tout – it would be too dangerous/tracable to keep.

  2. There is no doubt that such radios where available during this time, but what is questionable is that the British military would have over such a device to someone is such a Republican stronghold. Of all the informers and agents who have retold their stories over the years not one has mentioned that their handlers supplied them with such devices. IF, and it’s a huge IF, Jean McConnvile was an informer , then she would have been very low level indeed and as such hardly would have been in line to be issued with such equipment. Besides in a flat with 10 children how would you hide, never mind use such a device? Look at the size of the thing in those photographs.

    • How do you know they weren’t supplied to other informers? According to Brendan Hughes, her children knew that she had the radio, because that is how they got on to it. An IRA patrol in Divis was using a hand held radio and one of her children remarked to the patrol that his mother had a radio like that. The IRA then raided her flat and the device was found. If you had read ‘Voices From The Grave’ you would have known that…….

  3. If other informers were given such devices then at least one of them or their handlers would have mentioned it by now.

    The McConville children have stated they knew every inch of that flat and that hiding such a device would have been impossible. As a mother of ten there is no way Jean McConville would have used a British Army radio in front of any her children. It’s one of the basics of parenting you learn very quickly: never do anything in front of your children you don’t want them to know.

    After a quick scan through your book I found this about how Hughes became aware of the story.

    “Divis Flats at the time was a pretty active unit. A few of them, one of them in particular, young ——, received information from —— that —— had something in the house. I sent … a squad over to the house to check it out and there was a transmitter in the house”

    Having lied about this murder for 25 years I think it’s understandable that anything members of the IRA say about it should be taken with a large grain of salt.

  4. I think that goes without saying , Ed.

  5. My reading of Keefe is that he leans toward a finding that she was not complicit, but it remains an open question. (“Say Nothing,” pgs. 292-7)

    • and my reading of keefe is that he leaves out vital information which a) shows she was probably an agent, and b) that shows the authorities have lied – he ignored this in bid to paint a sympathetic picture of her (and to sell books)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.