More Puzzling Questions From Brexit Breakdown

In no particular order of significance:

1. Surely Theresa May would/should have known that the DUP would never accept anything approaching the deal she discussed with EU chiefs? The DUP had made it clear a day or so before her lunch with European Council President Donald Tusk that it would not accept any deal which diluted NI’s membership of the UK. Doing a deal behind the DUP’s back would also torpedo the confidence and supply agreement May struck with the party in order to sustain her government in power. Did she not realise that treating NI is such a way would set a precedent for Wales and/or Scotland, and that the road she proposed travelling could lead to the break up of the UK as we know it?

2. This question follows from what I wrote above: Is Theresa May therefore just stupid or has she failed to understand the last century or so of Anglo-Irish politics?

3. If Leo Varadkar did insist that the DUP should not be told about the ‘regulatory alignment’ deal before it has been settled between May and Tusk, as has been reported inter alia in the Guardian, what does this say about his lack of understanding of Unionism? Since the days of Daniel O’Connell and the Home Rule crises of the 19th century, Unionists have never trusted governments in London, always fearful of being sold out, always suspicious that they were being tricked and/or lied to. It is part of their political DNA and explains why conditional loyalty has defined political Unionism for decades (and why the British body politic and media have always found difficulty getting their heads around the concept of Loyalism). Varadkar’s insistence that the DUP be kept in the dark played to all these fears, meaning that even if May had done the deal with the EU, May’s government would probably have been brought down by the DUP, notwithstanding the possibility that a fresh election would have brought Corbyn into Downing Street. The reality is that the DUP would probably have calculated that if it had allowed the deal to survive, Arlene Foster would have been overthrown, the DUP riven by dissension and the hard men of Loyalism would be back on the streets. Neither Varadkar nor May appear to have understood the fires they were playing with.

4. A crucial event was the leak to RTE yesterday morning, just before May’s lunch with Tusk. Seemingly intended to signal an Irish diplomatic triumph (the EU had already given Dublin a veto on the deal), it instead alerted and alarmed the DUP, by all accounts, and led to Foster’s angry phone call to May as she prepared to break bread with the EU chiefs. RTE journalist, Tony Connelly, the station’s Europe editor who broadcast details of the deal, has denied that the leaker worked in or for the Irish government. Hmmmmm. That proves nothing. If I was Leo Varadkar and I wanted to leak the document without leaving telling fingerprints that would be the easiest thing to do. If you want to know who leaked something ask two questions: which outlet was chosen as the conduit (i.e. whose audience was targeted?) and cui bono?

5. I am entirely out of touch with who is who in the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs (a bunch of people I never had easy relations with by the way) but I do wonder about the calibre of the people dealing with the North these days, assuming there any. When all is said and done they were the guys who allowed this to happen.

6 responses to “More Puzzling Questions From Brexit Breakdown

  1. Foster, asked on TV about her source for her *Leo vetoed release of text* claim, says a UK official  source. Dublin  categorically denies it leaked and says it had no such dealings with London – EU handled the negotiations with UK and Dublin  was in touch with EU and Dublin never asked EU  for any veto on release Tom

    From: The Broken Elbow To: Sent: Tuesday, 5 December 2017, 19:16 Subject: [New post] More Puzzling Questions From Brexit Breakdown #yiv5415970442 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv5415970442 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv5415970442 a.yiv5415970442primaryactionlink:link, #yiv5415970442 a.yiv5415970442primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv5415970442 a.yiv5415970442primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv5415970442 a.yiv5415970442primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv5415970442 | The Broken Elbow posted: “In no particular order of significance:1. Surely Theresa May would/should have known that the DUP would never accept anything approaching the deal she discussed with EU chiefs? The DUP had made it clear a day or so before her lunch with European Counc” | |

  2. Something doesn’t smell right, that’s for sure.

    What are the chances of a British official releasing it to undermine T. May?

  3. Pingback: More Puzzling Questions From Brexit Breakdown – seachranaidhe1

  4. Classic Foreign Office fudges in Dublin & London, out of touch with the ‘little’ people, in this case, the DUP, we will leave on a hard deal which will bad news for Ireland, but i couldn’t care less about that after their duplicity in this sordid affair, once we have left we can revoke the free movement of Irish people to the UK, if they want to be in the EU, they shouldn’t be afforded free movement of travel or free healthcare to us.

    Of course there is a simple, but ultimately costly resolution of the NI issue, we relocate all of the people who want to remain British to the UK & send all Irish people excl, those married to Brits back to NI & stick the EU for the reparations for the cost of developed land eg. houses etc, pensions for Catholics who choose to stay would be about £48b that SI would have to meet & mortgage transfer liabilities as no mortgages would be protected by the BoE, the Irish would be happy as they can have what they have always wanted, an Irish Catholic state

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.