Monthly Archives: October 2024

Roy Garland on corruption in high places….

By Roy Garland

The various inquiries into the sexual abuse of boys at the Kincora Working Boys Hostel by William McGrath and a number of others, ignored the long history abuse at McGrath’sevangelical mission.  It is thought that more than a hundred boys and some women were abused there over the years.   The mission was named the Christian Fellowship Centre and Irish Emancipation Crusade (CFCIEC) and based at Faith House, which was located at various centres in Belfast from 1941 until the 1980s.  Abuse took place at various centres led by McGrath, who was officially Secretary but who controlled the mission.  The official aim was to take an evangelical gospel to the whole Irish people but only a tiny number of visits took place to the Republic.  According to a reliable source abuse also took place during these visits.

The whole issue of abuse was raised in the 1950s and efforts were made to stop this, but it continued.  A political sideeventually developed and became central by the early 1960s.   Warnings were given at Church and Mission Hall across Northern Ireland about the alleged designs of the Catholic Church to control Ireland and leave Protestants in chains. By late 1969 a ginger group named Tara became paramilitary group and was expected to grow to become an army capable of resisting enemies of Ulster.  By late 1973, the RUC’s DC Jim Cullen was asked to investigate the abuse. I met him thatNovember and he already knew some of this, but neededevidence, so I asked a young man, who had earlier agreed to bear witness before Orange Order leaders if they engaged in a serious inquiry. I now asked if he would speak with the RUC. To my surprise he said yes, and DC Jim Cullen met him at Donegall Pass and spoke freely and in detail about years of abuse.  Cullen took no notes, but this did not concern me, as Iassumed the “interview” was being recorded. It was not aformal interview he simply told his story. 

I was told by another RUC source that Donegall Pass RUC, was a hive of dubious activity, and that some RUC were Taramembers who had helped train others.  One man felt he was unable to continue at Donegall Pass because of his refusal toengage in illegal activity.   He said senior RUC Officers knewof this and condoned it.  The young man insisted I staythroughout the interview, so I heard his straight-forward account, which had begun when he was about 15 years old.  The RUC’s DC Jim Cullen was warned by other RUC there not to “dig too deeply” on McGrath.   While Chris Moore’s launched his book on Kincora in 1996, DC Jim Cullen told me an alarming story about fellow RUC taking him prisoner at the Station.   They had forgotten to search him, so he drew his gun, and they had to release him.  This took place at Donegall Pass where some RUC feared their questionable activitiescoming to light.  I was later shocked to be told that DC Cullenlater denied the interview had taken place, although I was present throughout and heard it all.  However, Cullen toldChris Moore around this time: 

I regarded it as an important issue because of the children involved.  The bottom line was that if it was true, the safety of children was paramount and the longer it went on the likelihood of tragedy was even greater.

But tragedy had already struck, and lives had been ruined, others damaged or the became suicidal since the mission was formed in 1941.  The fact that the abuse of young Christians took place at a Christian mission, made the grooming potentially more damaging and some found it impossible to believe.  Although DC Jim Cullen had denied that the interview had taken place, he was recorded by Chris Moore as follows:

Cullen was a little vague.  He said he thought this meeting had taken place at Garland’s house.  Garland had given Cullen this man’s name and had suggested he might be able to help with the investigation.  Cullen had asked to meet this person and so the meeting was arranged.  But he couldn’t tell me any more than Garland had already. Cullen said, “Otherwise something would have been done.”

DC Cullen knew the young witness would not likely to reveal something new but would reinforce the message that too much pain had already been inflicted on young people at a Christian mission.  Perhaps he needed evidence of recent abuse, but he wrongly claimed:

There was a difficulty in getting these people to stand up and face the McGrath situation. Understandably, they had new lives now.  Garland and this other fellow didn’t feel they could go through with it.

This was untrue because Cullen never asked either of us “to stand up and face McGrath” or to “go through with it” butCullen admitted to Chris Moore that the interview did takeplace, not at my home but at Donegall Pass RUC Station, where I assumed it was being recorded.   I did not give Cullen the young man’s name and Cullen never tried to persuade either of us to come forward as witnesses but instead he triedto dissuade us by claiming our evidence was “out-of-date” and he discouraged further action. This I suspect was because of threats and opposition coming from fellow RUC at the Station.  The young witness spoke openly and rejected McGrath’s claim to be counselling young people, as he had groomed and abused many since 1941 when his mission was set up or even before this.   

About a year or two later I asked the young witness if he would speak again with the RUC, but he refused, which I understood and admired his courage. He remained a good friend and appreciated what I had tried to do for him.   On the 4th March 1982 DC Cullen told me not to contact him at Donegall Pass by phone. He believed he was being monitored and was facing threats from within the RUC.   The reality of possibly hundreds being abused was never properly investigated.

Israel Badly Losing Propaganda War Over Gaza

Israel Is Now A Neo-Nazi State Backed By US and UK…..

Watch this and see if it is at all possible to disagree: https://youtu.be/kPE6vbKix6A?si=HZOETfqSl2TTQv-q

The Tragic Impact of Sexual Abuse

Roy Garland continues his fateful journey towards Kincora:

McGrath said he encouraged a young female volunteer, tofondle the legs of a young male volunteer working in shorts on a ladder in the grounds of Faith House.  “Joan” (not her real name) told me she had been confronted at the mission by two naked men.  No details were given but those involvedwere all likely to be volunteers at the mission. Joan and the boy may have been abused or attempts may have been madeto abuse them.  Many boys were abused at the mission, but apart from a two or three none were homosexual, but were young Christians, seeking to develop their skills and dedicate their lives to Christian service.  McGrath at times tried to entice boys with females and he denied being gay, but eventually he pleaded guilty to some abuse.  His sexual orientation was irrelevant as he was an insatiable abuser mainly but not exclusively of boys.  Joan had been devastated by what happened to her.  McGrath said he had taken her into Faith House, for recuperation after a failed love affair with a boy at an English College where a senior figure was abusing students.  

This was a clergyman who McGrath knew and who had abused mainly, but not exclusively, boys and young men.   I was told that the clergyman was a “Missionary Statesman,” which I believe was meant to raise his status in my eyes.  Once or twice boys or young men from the college approached a friend in Belfast to complain about the abuse.  The friend told them to speak to the College Principal, which they did but he had known absolutely nothing about this butconducted his own investigation and learned it was true, which left him deeply traumatised.   After Joan told me about the abuse of children at her Children’s meetings, I confrontedMcGrath with this, but he totally denied everything andclaimed she was suffering mental problems and that she was imagining these things.  The idea seemed outlandish, and I wasn’t sure what to make of it but kept it in mind.  

I had first met McGrath at Faith House Finaghy after being invited as a 16-year-old and he impressed me with his apparent knowledge of psychology and much else, but he touched me inappropriately.   I denounced him as a homosexual, but I had never knowingly met an abuser or a homosexual before this.  I approached the door to leave, but he immediately asked me to follow him down a corridor where he introduced his wife and young children.  At that time, I shared the prevalent view among my friends that gay men did not marry or have children but later I realised I was mistaken but kept the thoughts to myself.  After this he claimed, he was trying to put right the overemphasis in the media and cinemas etc on heterosexuality.  He claimed he was trying to put this right and encouraged friendships between boys saying this was to counteract the emphasis on heterosexuality.  He said European men were different amdmore like to greet each other with friendly hugs etc which wasan aspect of normal friendship, and he insisted he was not advocating homosexuality.  

Later he claimed that all men had homosexual as well as heterosexual needs and they needed to express this to findfreedom.  I remember telling him I was not attracted to this in any way, and he told me I was “in denial.”  I did wonder if I was unwittingly concealing something but, he gave up on me and claimed I was “too heterosexual.”  He had some knowledge of psychology which he used to good effect.  Ieventually decided to try to confirm that the abuse had continued at Faith House since the 1940s and did this by speaking with older men at the mission who confirmed they had been abused in she 1940s.  I began to suspect that the abuse may have begun before the mission at Faith House was even formed in 1941.  The suffering of one man who confided in me was so great he could not be described as a survivor, as his suffering was life-long.  

“Sam”, (not his real name) spoke briefly with me in the late 1960s / early 1970s.  He was in a terrible state having been abused in the 1940s when the mission was residential andsometimes seen as a commune.   Sam was a 14-year-old when McGrath him he was homosexual and that had mental problems.  He had visited our home with his wife, and he accompanied me in my car to collect our young son in Belfast, but on the way, he began to open up and tell a harrowing story of being abused at the mission in the 1940s.   He had never recovered from the dire impact, yet received little, if any help from official sources, but spent time in a psychiatric hospital.  

As we spoke in the car Sam’s suffering was so palpable I could almost feel his pain.   However, my son arrived before we could explore the matter much further. “Sam” stoppedtalking but I hoped and expected the conversation would continue on another occasion, but the opportunity never arose.  I felt I could not try to contact him or his wife, because she was also distraught and was receiving treatment. The issue of abuse for young evangelical Christians was so sensitive they often faced decades of pain.  I managed to speak briefly with his wife but felt constrained in what I was able to say.  She was ill and receiving treatment.  Her parents had beenChristian workers, and she was reared in a strict Christian home.  She was told at a Day Centre that her husband’s condition was unrelated to the abuse, but I have no doubt it was a direct consequence of the grooming and abuse. The opportunity to speak again never arose, but I never forgot andtried to contact a relative, who did not respond. I felt I could have helped if given a chance.

A brother of Sam who knew of his suffering was so angry he wished to speak with Pastor Billy Mullan and Valerie Shaw approached the Pastor who told her he would seek information from contacts in the underground, but this was unlikely as McGrath would avoid such places like the plague. Sometime later Pastor Mullan was found apparently he had shot himself dead after rumours about happenings at his remote cottage.  

It seemed clear that not everyone suffered such pain, as Sam did, but many seemed unable to discuss the matter.   One young woman was so deeply distressed and hurt by the way McGrath had misused her she had suffered terribly.  She had dedicated her life to Christian service but was treated abominably.  I also spoke with boys and young men who wereabused more recently and concluded that at least a hundred or more victims had been abused since the mission was set up and some were I believe abused even before this.  Two women also claimed McGrath had “tried” to have sex with each of them.  When stories about Kincora became public the wife of another victim called a meeting and invited me to this, and I attended.   This was a very difficult meeting because I believe two of the men had been abused by McGrath, but their wives seemed unaware of this.  One man would only say, “There are things I could not tell my wife.”  He seemed a bit stilted in his ways, but this was not seen as problem.  

McGrath told a friend and I that this man’s problem would manifest themselves during the hymn singing at prayer meetings and we should watch carefully.  We did so but neither of us saw anything significant.  I visited him as he was dying, and I think he wished to say something, but I could not broach the subject as there were others present. His parents had been warned not to let their young son become involved at Faith House, but he did so and stayed at Faith House for many years.   The suffering of most victims remained hidden, perhaps because the perpetrator was of value to IntelligenceAgencies so seemed to be protected

Roy Garland Continues His Journey To Kincora

The Tragic Impact of Sexual Abuse.

By Roy Garland

McGrath said he encouraged a young female volunteer, tofondle the legs of a young male volunteer working in shorts on a ladder in the grounds of Faith House.  “Joan” (not her real name) told me she had been confronted at the mission by two naked men.  No details were given but those involvedwere all likely to be volunteers at the mission. Joan and the boy may have been abused or attempts may have been madeto abuse them.  Many boys were abused at the mission, but apart from a two or three none were homosexual, but were young Christians, seeking to develop their skills and dedicate their lives to Christian service.  McGrath at times tried to entice boys with females and he denied being gay, but eventually he pleaded guilty to some abuse.  His sexual orientation was irrelevant as he was an insatiable abuser mainly but not exclusively of boys.  Joan had been devastated by what happened to her.  McGrath said he had taken her into Faith House, for recuperation after a failed love affair with a boy at an English College where a senior figure was abusing students.  

This was a clergyman who McGrath knew and who had abused mainly, but not exclusively, boys and young men.   I was told that the clergyman was a “Missionary Statesman,” which I believe was meant to raise his status in my eyes.  Once or twice boys or young men from the college approached a friend in Belfast to complain about the abuse.  The friend told them to speak to the College Principal, which they did but he had known absolutely nothing about this butconducted his own investigation and learned it was true, which left him deeply traumatised.   After Joan told me about the abuse of children at her Children’s meetings, I confrontedMcGrath with this, but he totally denied everything andclaimed she was suffering mental problems and that she was imagining these things.  The idea seemed outlandish, and I wasn’t sure what to make of it but kept it in mind.  

I had first met McGrath at Faith House Finaghy after being invited as a 16-year-old and he impressed me with his apparent knowledge of psychology and much else, but he touched me inappropriately.   I denounced him as a homosexual, but I had never knowingly met an abuser or a homosexual before this.  I approached the door to leave, but he immediately asked me to follow him down a corridor where he introduced his wife and young children.  At that time, I shared the prevalent view among my friends that gay men did not marry or have children but later I realised I was mistaken but kept the thoughts to myself.  After this he claimed, he was trying to put right the overemphasis in the media and cinemas etc on heterosexuality.  He claimed he was trying to put this right and encouraged friendships between boys saying this was to counteract the emphasis on heterosexuality.  He said European men were different amdmore like to greet each other with friendly hugs etc which wasan aspect of normal friendship, and he insisted he was not advocating homosexuality.  

Later he claimed that all men had homosexual as well as heterosexual needs and they needed to express this to findfreedom.  I remember telling him I was not attracted to this in any way, and he told me I was “in denial.”  I did wonder if I was unwittingly concealing something but, he gave up on me and claimed I was “too heterosexual.”  He had some knowledge of psychology which he used to good effect.  Ieventually decided to try to confirm that the abuse had continued at Faith House since the 1940s and did this by speaking with older men at the mission who confirmed they had been abused in she 1940s.  I began to suspect that the abuse may have begun before the mission at Faith House was even formed in 1941.  The suffering of one man who confided in me was so great he could not be described as a survivor, as his suffering was life-long.  

“Sam”, (not his real name) spoke briefly with me in the late 1960s / early 1970s.  He was in a terrible state having been abused in the 1940s when the mission was residential andsometimes seen as a commune.   Sam was a 14-year-old when McGrath him he was homosexual and that had mental problems.  He had visited our home with his wife, and he accompanied me in my car to collect our young son in Belfast, but on the way, he began to open up and tell a harrowing story of being abused at the mission in the 1940s.   He had never recovered from the dire impact, yet received little, if any help from official sources, but spent time in a psychiatric hospital.  

As we spoke in the car Sam’s suffering was so palpable I could almost feel his pain.   However, my son arrived before we could explore the matter much further. “Sam” stoppedtalking but I hoped and expected the conversation would continue on another occasion, but the opportunity never arose.  I felt I could not try to contact him or his wife, because she was also distraught and was receiving treatment. The issue of abuse for young evangelical Christians was so sensitive they often faced decades of pain.  I managed to speak briefly with his wife but felt constrained in what I was able to say.  She was ill and receiving treatment.  Her parents had beenChristian workers, and she was reared in a strict Christian home.  She was told at a Day Centre that her husband’s condition was unrelated to the abuse, but I have no doubt it was a direct consequence of the grooming and abuse. The opportunity to speak again never arose, but I never forgot andtried to contact a relative, who did not respond. I felt I could have helped if given a chance.

A brother of Sam who knew of his suffering was so angry he wished to speak with Pastor Billy Mullan and Valerie Shaw approached the Pastor who told her he would seek information from contacts in the underground, but this was unlikely as McGrath would avoid such places like the plague. Sometime later Pastor Mullan was found apparently he had shot himself dead after rumours about happenings at his remote cottage.  

It seemed clear that not everyone suffered such pain, as Sam did, but many seemed unable to discuss the matter.   One young woman was so deeply distressed and hurt by the way McGrath had misused her she had suffered terribly.  She had dedicated her life to Christian service but was treated abominably.  I also spoke with boys and young men who wereabused more recently and concluded that at least a hundred or more victims had been abused since the mission was set up and some were I believe abused even before this.  Two women also claimed McGrath had “tried” to have sex with each of them.  When stories about Kincora became public the wife of another victim called a meeting and invited me to this, and I attended.   This was a very difficult meeting because I believe two of the men had been abused by McGrath, but their wives seemed unaware of this.  One man would only say, “There are things I could not tell my wife.”  He seemed a bit stilted in his ways, but this was not seen as problem.  

McGrath told a friend and I that this man’s problem would manifest themselves during the hymn singing at prayer meetings and we should watch carefully.  We did so but neither of us saw anything significant.  I visited him as he was dying, and I think he wished to say something, but I could not broach the subject as there were others present. His parents had been warned not to let their young son become involved at Faith House, but he did so and stayed at Faith House for many years.   The suffering of most victims remained hidden, perhaps because the perpetrator was of value to IntelligenceAgencies so seemed to be protected.