Monthly Archives: October 2017

Trump’s America (cont’d)

October 13, 2017
By Joe Kloc

Congressional Republicans reportedly said that US president Donald Trump was “nuts,” “unfit,” and “dangerous,” and that they were “praying” Trump didn’t “do something really, really stupid” before they reformed the tax code and then removed him from office; the Republican speaker of the House told Congress that they may need to work “till Christmas” to pass tax-reform legislation as soon as possible; and Trump complained about department stores using red decorations but not making their employees say “Merry Christmas” to customers. “America is a nation,” said Trump, “sustained by the power of prayer.” Trump announced that his administration was “stopping cold the attacks on Judeo-Christian values”; and then signed an executive order to stop subsidizing the cost of health insurance for poor people, which he said he was “only doing” because “it costs” him nothing. Trump declared flashlights obsolete as he handed them out to Puerto Ricans, 90 percent of whom had no electricity in their homes; and tweeted that he wouldn’t keep providing federal hurricane relief “forever” to Puerto Rico, a US territory that the secretary of energy referred to as a “country.” Vice President Mike Pence attended a football game in Indiana, where he responded to NFL players not standing for the national anthem to protest police killings of black men and women by leaving the game in protest; Trump tweeted that the players were disrespecting the American flag; and Trump remained seated during a flag-honoring ceremony at the base of the Pennsylvania Air National Guard, where he did not put his hand on his heart and then asked if the bugle was playing for him or for his companion, a talk-show host whose ratings he then complimented. Trump said that the Keystone XL pipeline, which he approved two months into his administration and which is still not under construction, was approved by him “within twenty-four hours” and was currently under construction; that Obama was responsible for the formation of the Islamic State, which formed two years before Obama took office; that a journalist “set up” Republican senator Bob Corker by secretly recording their conversation, which captured Corker asking the journalist to record him; and that Chief of Staff John Kelly “loves” his job “more than anything he’s ever done.” “It is not the best job I ever had,” said Kelly. A reporter asked Trump about a lunch the president was said to have shared the previous day with his secretary of state, Trump said the reporter was “behind the times” and that the lunch had occurred the previous week, and the White House confirmed that the lunch had in fact occurred the previous day. Trump said that he had no schedule for his administration but that if he did he would be “substantially ahead of schedule,” that “a lot of countries are starting to respect the United States of America,” and that he “met with the president of the Virgin Islands,” a US territory of which he is president. “What’s that?” Trump reportedly asked when he was told of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, which gives his cabinet members the power to remove him from office.

‘The Soldiers – Belfast 1972’

This is a British TV documentary based on the life of British soldiers stationed in Belfast at Christmastime, 1972 at the height of the war with the IRA. The interviewer is not named but sounds very much like Peter Taylor who in 1972 worked for Thames TV’s This Week programme. Notice how much he frames the conflict in Protestant v. Catholic terms.

Sinn Fein’s Southern Malcontents…..

An interesting piece below from last week’s Sunday Independent, written by an old Tribune colleague, Maeve Sheehan, which some of my followers may have missed.

It deals with a burgeoning problem for Sinn Fein, the flight of talented elected activists in the 26 Counties who have become angered or disillusioned by the extent of what they call ‘bullying’ by the party hierarchy. Quite a few have quit in anger.

What they complain of – although most almost certainly do not know it – is really a feature of Provo republicanism that goes back to the origins of the modern Sinn Fein, back to the re-organisation of the IRA that followed the defeat of the O Bradaigh-O Connail leadership by the Adams-Bell-McGuinness faction in the aftermath of the 1974-75 IRA ceasefire.

Facing near defeat by a new British policy of criminalisation, the IRA was re-structured into Northern and Southern commands, a new security unit was created, some cells were created and the organisation ‘politicised’ for a long war.

A central feature of that politicisation was the new status given to Sinn Fein – hitherto mostly a bunch of IRA cheerleaders – which would be given the task of making the Provos relevant, socially and economically, to the Catholic base so that there would be a reason, other than killing British soldiers and RUC men, for people to support the IRA.

A draft of the re-organisation plan was found in a Dublin flat where the then Chief of Staff, Seamus Twomey was hiding in December 1977 and when Twomey was tried for escaping from Mountjoy jail in 1973, portions of the document were read out in court.

Sinn Fein, the document read, ‘would come under Army discipline at all levels’.

And for years thereafter Sinn Fein was treated as part of the IRA. If the IRA gave an order to jump, SF’s reply would be ‘How high?’ Now the Provo hierarchy never liked to be reminded of this reality and I can remember Gerry Adams once bridling in anger when in conversation, I referred to the IRA as ‘the parent body’. But he was fooling no-one. The Army called the shots.

Now a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then. We have had ceasefires, decommissioning, the consent principle accepted, Stormont recognised, the hands of British royalty shaken, Dail seats taken and so on.

But one thing has not changed. Sinn Fein is still regarded by the leadership as an Army instrument, to be used as the leaders demand, to obey and not to question – and don’t be fooled, the IRA still exists (who do you think does all the spying or husbands the investment portfolio?). The days are gone, admittedly, when the relationship was transparent but it lives on in the attitudes which have forced so many councilors and TD’s to quit the party.

And it is not without significance that you don’t hear any complaints about bullying north of Newry, just in the south.

Anyway here is Maeve Sheehan’s article. Enjoy.

The once loyal followers who have fallen out with Sinn Fein

OUT OF THE PARTY: Melissa O’Neill 3
OUT OF THE PARTY: Melissa O’Neill
Maeve Sheehan

Maeve Sheehan

Sorcha O’Neill is one of a number of once loyal elected representatives and members who have fallen out with Sinn Fein in recent years.

Some have quit the party, others have been expelled, and some remain in Sinn Fein but have criticised the party publicly. Some have claimed they were bullied, some they were mistreated. Sinn Fein has repeatedly insisted that bullying isn’t tolerated in the party. Sinn Fein has also said that local disputes arise but it’s not always possible to resolve them, as demonstrated by our list of those who have had issues with the party.

Sorcha O’Neill was a councillor in Kildare. She resigned from Sinn Fein in April, claiming she experienced “bullying, hostility and aggression”.

Another of the people on our list, Melissa O’Neill, organised a meeting in Waterford last weekend for disaffected members and former members of the party.

More meetings are expected to be held in the coming weeks.

O’Neill, a councillor in Kilkenny, was expelled from Sinn Fein last year, after a disciplinary process over video footage that emerged of a public argument. She alleges she had been bullied prior to the video and is considering legal action against the party.

OUT OF THE PARTY: John Snell 3 3

Others to have fallen out with Sinn Fein include:

Lisa Marie Sheehy, councillor in Limerick. She resigned from Sinn Fein in September, claiming she had been “undermined, bullied and humiliated”;

Gerry O’Neill, councillor in Wicklow, was expelled from Sinn Fein in September. He is one of three councillors who challenged the party in a dispute over internal leadership roles. He has accused “unelected” party figures of undue influence and control;

John Snell, councillor in Wicklow. He was expelled from Sinn Fein in September, and is another of the Wicklow trio who challenged the party about internal leadership roles;

OUT OF THE PARTY: Lisa Marie Sheehy 3 3
OUT OF THE PARTY: Lisa Marie Sheehy

Oliver O’Brien, councillor in Wicklow. Expelled from Sinn Fein in September, he is the third of the Wicklow councillors to challenge Sinn Fein’s internal leadership roles;

Tara O’Grady, human rights activist and Sinn Fein member. Expelled from the party in July. She believes it was because she assisted the three Wicklow councillors by accompanying them to meetings with Sinn Fein;

Eugene Greenan, former councillor in Cavan. Resigned from his Sinn Fein council seat in June, but remains a party member. Although he left in part for personal reasons, he later accused Sinn Fein of having an “element of dictatorship” and of “acting like bullies”;

Paul Hogan, councillor in Westmeath. Although he remains a Sinn Fein councillor, he claimed in June that he was “bullied”, “threatened” and subjected to a “whispering campaign” by elements in the party;

Seamus Morris, councillor in Tipperary. An attempt to expel him from the local organisation earlier this year failed, and he remains a Sinn Fein councillor. He claimed last month that he was subjected to a nine-month campaign of harassment and slander, and considered taking his own life;

Sandra McLellan, former Sinn Fein TD for Cork East. She declined to run in the 2016 general election and claimed there had been attempts to “undermine and malign” her within the party;

Ger Keohane, councillor in Cork East. Resigned from Sinn Fein in November 2015, and although he has not spoken publicly, it is believed he was unhappy with the party;

June Murphy, councillor in Cork East. Resigned from Sinn Fein in 2015, but did not speak publicly about her reasons until last month, claiming there is a “bullying culture” in Sinn Fein and that the party demeans women;

Kieran McCarthy, councillor in Cork East, Expelled from Sinn Fein in June 2015, after an internal inquiry accused him of “uncomradely” behaviour, which he denied. His expulsion was later lifted but he refused to return to the party;

Jonathan Dowdall, former councillor in Dublin. Resigned in 2014 for health reasons but he also claimed there was a “whispering campaign” and of “bullying” within the party. He has since been jailed for a false imprisonment and threats.

Sunday Independent

Jackie Chan And Gerry Adams Make A Movie…..

‘History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce’ – Karl Marx

Sinn Fein’s Gloomy Prospects South Of The Border…..

I am not too sure where this piece on Sinn Fein’s political prospects in the South originated – it appears in Hibernia Forum but the author seems to have written it also for the Irish Times web edition. No matter, it is well worth a read.

I first came across the author, Eamon Delaney in a sort of second-hand way when he was an official in the Irish delegation to the United Nations in New York back in the 1990’s. I knew him to be the source for an interesting piece of gossip about an Irish Times journalist who had proudly coined the acronym, JAP‘s, for journalists like myself who subjected the peace process to the sort of tough scrutiny it merited, as with any story.

JAP‘s stood for ‘Journalists Against Peace’ and the designation gained currency when the Irish media in particular was divided into two camps: the helpful and the unhelpful. The helpful rarely asked awkward questions, diligently wrote down what was told to them, wrote it up and went no further; the unhelpful did ask awkward questions and were not frightened to record the answers. Needless to say they were scorned for their pains. It was not Irish journalism’s proudest moment. But was there ever such a moment?

Anyhow I digress. Eamon Delaney is one of the founder members of a group called the Hibernia Forum which was set up in October 2015 and is funded, according to one report, by ‘entrepreneurs’. A posting on had this to say about its ideology, in case you couldn’t decipher the preceding sentence:

‘The Hibernia Forum was launched today by Eamon Delaney, Cllr. Keith Redmond, and Cormac Lucey. The group support free market capitalism and are hawkish on the state of government finances.’

So, it is right of center and pro-business. In fact one of its founders is a libertarian, a credo which might appear quaint, and even progressive, from the safe distance of Ireland but here in the US, where it was spawned and is now the favored creed of multi-billionaires, it can be seen for it is: the politics and economics of Darwin at their scariest – and tough luck if you’re not fit enough.

But even a broken clock can be right twice a day. And here Eamon Delaney has written an assessment of Sinn Fein’s prospects in the Republic which is difficult to contest.

He asks the pointed question: ‘…..where is Sinn Fein actually going right now, and does it, in fact, have a way into Government even if it wanted to?’

His answer, essentially, is nowhere and no. Neither Fine Gael nor Fianna Fail show any inclination or need to invite SF to sit at their cabinet tables, the left in the Dail have lost all trust and want little to do with them and the party sits politically inert, stuck at sixteen per cent in the polls, its promised electoral breakthrough as much a chimera as it ever was.

I would add this to SF’s incipient woes: the perceived solution to Sinn Fein’s troubles, Gerry Adams’ retirement from the political stage, is touted as a move which will bring closure to the endless scandals from his dark past, freeing Mary Lou and Pearse to present a new, clean face to the Irish voter and giving Sinn Fein that important extra charge.

But if we are being honest, wasn’t Sinn Fein’s bloodstained face one of the reasons why people voted for it in the first place? A whiff of cordite around a politician and his party, a readiness to have risked and taken life for an idea, signifies strong principles and a special sort of determination, qualities in short supply in most political parties, especially in Ireland.

How many people in the South voted for Sinn Fein because their recent history of involvement in violence made them more trustworthy, less likely to sell out principle for personal gain – even if they could not personally condone what was done? I suspect the answer would make many of Ireland’s commentators uncomfortable.

There is a great if unspoken risk associated with dumping Gerry Adams as leader of Sinn Fein. The party may lose or demoralise its base while failing to convince hitherto unfriendly sections of the electorate. It may be the party’s undoing.

Anyway, here is Eamon Delaney’s piece on Sinn Fein. Enjoy.

Rejected by left and right, where now for an unreconstructed Sinn Fein?

Eamon Delaney in The

In the Dail last week, the Taoiseach gave a lengthy and effective put down to the Deputy leader of Sinn Fein, Mary Lou MacDonald, after she complained that Fine Gael – and ‘your Fianna Fail friends’, in a recognition of the cosy ‘new politics’ ! – did nothing for families rearing children. It was the first of two days of spats between them.

Stung by this accusation, given that the Government is actually working on tax cuts for ‘working families’, Varadkar shot back with a long derisive tirade, accusing Sinn Fein of doing nothing for working families themselves. And, in fact, doing nothing to get into Government, north or south, where SF could effect change. Instead, the self-styled Republican party was clinging to the sidelines, he said, from where it can just protest and condemn, and endlessly complain.

Regardless of what one thinks of Varadkar, it was a compelling put down and the silence in the chamber suggested that most deputies agreed. After all, FF had been included in Mary Lou’s insults ! McDonald’s come back was cheap, and needlessly personal as is often her style. Just ask ex Garda Commissioner, Noreen O’Sullivan.

‘I am actually raising two children’ Mary Lou told Leo, missing the point that the argument was about her party and not her. (We are, of course, assuming that the remark wasn’t accidental dog whistle homophobia that Leo is not, in fact, ‘raising children’ right now).

However, Varadkar’s put-down also raised a bigger question: where is Sinn Fein actually going right now, and does it, in fact, have a way into Government even if it wanted to?

Or is the party living up to its actual literal title – Ourselves Alone ? After all, it has been totally ruled out as coalition partners by both Fianna Fail from the centre but also the far left from the other side. We have to believe Michael Martin now when he says that he would not form any Government with Sinn Fein, even if some ambitious FF TDs would be prepared to accept such a palatable prospect just to gain power.

Mind you, we may not have an election until 2019 so the main impediment to such a FF-SF coalition, which is the removal of Gerry Adams (or of Michael Martin!) may have taken place by then. You never know, but just at the moment, a FF- SF coalition is most unlikely.

Meanwhile, the Solidarity/People Before Profit hard left grouping has ruled out coalescing with SF as it sees them, probably correctly, as centrist appeasers who would share power with one of the bigger parties if need be. So the long-held Trotskyite disdain for SF as not being ‘true socialist believers’ has finally come to a head. Much sooner than we might have expected, it must be said. So the party is snookered.

But the really bleak thing must be Sinn Fein’s standing, which continues to be stuck at 16 % in the latest poll, after an actual drop, and with no real likelihood of rising. So is the game finally up for them, in terms of being a major Government component in the South? Or even in the North, where they have walked away from power and the DUP hold all the cards, as Northern Ireland faces Brexit.

Sinn Fein has been taken aback by Brexit (as has Ireland in general, in fairness) and by the frustration that the party has to honour its lifelong abstention policy from Westminster means it cannot go to London and influence the issue, as everyone wants them to do.

And of course, the party is embroiled in yet more allegations of bullying and internal harassment with one former member threatening to go completely public about the inside culture of almost totalitarian control One story reports that the party ignored suggested guidelines on this, by an outside body, for almost two years

The transition from being a cult to a respectable modern party is just not happening – and certainly not quick enough. Meanwhile, Adams who by clinging on for so long bears a lot of blame for the party’s hanging back, spends the weekends speaking at gravesides. On the Saturday, it was for the War Of Independence hero Thomas Ashe and on the Sunday it was for the ‘heroes’ of a quite different war, the Provisional IRA’s Tyrone Martyrs.

Sinn Fein often complains that its critics wont move on from dwelling on the party’s violent past and the atrocities of the IRA, and it is absolutely right. Sinn Fein deserves great credit for moving the Republican movement to purely peaceful means, and for holding to this in the face of an often intransigent Unionism as well as violent abuse and threats from dissident Republicans. But how can critics not bring up SF’s disturbing past, when SF itself will not move on from its violent past, and its obvious determination to celebrate these actions and legitimise their campaign of violence retrospectively ?

At the Tyrone event, Gerry Adams is pictured with men in black shirts and black sunglasses. This is just at a time when the family of Louth farmer, Tom Oliver, are looking for answers about the IRA’s killing of their father in 1991. Adams has said that pursuing Oliver’s killers would be counter productive -while himself demanding inquiries into previous British actions. It’s all mixed up.

The Tyrone Martyrs ceremony, incidentally, was partly to honour three IRA men killed in a shoot out with the SAS, after they were apparently on their way to ambush and kill a part-time UDR soldier and farmer who was fixing a wheel on a coal lorry.

The IRA men were probably shot in a ‘shoot to kill’ operation. But if it happened now, when such preventive actions are widespread in Europe to thwart Islamic attacks, there would be no fuss, just as the IRA’s campaign of violence, if done now, would wither under the glare of the 24 hour news cycle and a rightly outraged social media. But in the sepia-toned 1970s and 80s, the IRA got away with it.

Granted, we understand that SF has to appease its base with some recognition of previous IRA volunteers, but is there not a more tactful way to do it? For example, Pearse Doherty and Mary Lou McDonald also attended the Tyrone event, standing there amidst the flags and banners when maybe they should have been back in Dublin working on economic policy. And apparently there are more ceremonies to come, such as to mark the ambush of the Loughgall IRA martyrs, killed by the SAS while trying to bomb a police station.

Is this really the way to win over middle Ireland? Hardly. Until the party learns to fully modernise and look to the future instead of its violent past, and victimhood, it is hard to see how Sinn Fein can get beyond its 16% poll standing or be embraced as Government partners by either of the mainstream parties or by the hard left in whose protest culture it swims.

And all of this is without even considering Sinn Fein’s budget proposals, with their massive tax hikes, which would surely drive away any prospect of drawing in middle round voters !

Trump’s Heartless Immigration Crackdown

Full marks to The Nation magazine – America’s answer to the pre-Blairite, and now utterly unrecognisable New Statesman – for monitoring the Trumpite pursuit of illegal immigrants by the aptly named ICE agency (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

As one might expect, the enthusiasm with which ICE agents are pursuing their prey is matched only by their callous indifference for the fate of their victims. ‘Cold as Ice’ is the perfect title for the Nation’s column:

Why Did John Le Carre Never Send George Smiley To Belfast?

If any the claims about the level of British penetration of the various paramilitary groups during the Troubles are even half true – for example, an MI5 contention that by the early 1990’s, one out of three IRA activists were in the pay of the Security Service, RUC Special Branch or the military’s Force Research Unit – then it is clear that the years of political violence in Ireland were quite remarkable ones for British spooks.

The claimed level of penetration of the IRA outlined above would, if correct, mean in practice that intelligence operations in the years preceding the Good Friday Agreement would have been less concerned with putting the baddies behind bars and more about manipulating the organisation in directions of advantage to British policy. That’s just common sense. And that’s before you consider the level of penetration of Loyalist groups and the use to which that was put.

One example stands out. With the IRA’s spycatcher outfit, the Internal Security Unit, in the hands of people like Freddie Scappaticci, to name just one suspected double agent in that unit, the British would have a near complete picture of the IRA’s battle order and thus who should or could be replaced by whom to best advance British political interests.

This is never a popular thing to say, and invites accusations of a wish to undermine the peace process. But this does not make the question go away or to make it untrue, for it has hung over the IRA since the hunger strike years like an uninvited spectre at the banquet table.

Much of the detail is still speculation. Unlike the Americans, British spies are much more reticent about their activities, much more restrained by legal curbs such as the Official Secrets Act to boast about their exploits. (Peter Wright’s experiences, detailed below are evidence of that!)

But enough is in the public domain to bestow plausibility on the general notion that in the annals of counter-insurgency, Britain’s intelligence war in Northern Ireland, albeit lengthy and protracted and initially ham-fisted, was a distinctive success.

There may be other examples and I stand ready to be corrected, but off hand I cannot think of any other armed insurrection which, prior to the Good Friday Agreement, ended with the guerillas destroying their own weapons at the behest of their still fully armed foes, and with the same guerillas accepting the political prescription for peace laid down by their erstwhile enemies.

Which makes it all the more puzzling why Britain’s premier spy novelist, John le Carre has never set any of his stories in Ireland, never set out to discover how the great game was played on the streets of Belfast rather than East Berlin.

Having just read le Carre’s latest novel, A Legacy of Spies, that was a question that was on my ‘to do list’ of articles for this blog but, fair play to him, Joseph de Burca (any relation to Mairin?) has beaten me to it with an entertaining and informative piece in the current issue of Dublin’s Village magazine.

Here it is below. I hope you enjoy it:

by Joseph De Búrca 29 August, 2017,
One old spy’s secrets about Ireland

Peter Wright CBE of MI5 finally managed to publish his highly controversial memoirs, ‘Spycatcher’, exactly 30 years ago this July. He did so after winning a volcanic legal battle in Australia against Her Majesty’s Government (HMG) which had tried to prevent its publication. ‘Spycatcher’ cast MI5 and MI6 in a deplorable light: little more than organisations riddled with traitors and immersed in criminality.

Throughout the trial, HMG was stretched on an anvil and hammered mercilessly by Wright’s dogged lawyer, Malcolm Turnbull, who is now the Prime Minister of Australia. When Turnbull published his own account of the affair, ‘The Spycatcher Trial’, he recounted how he had asked Wright at their first meeting if he thought HMG feared he might reveal other secrets. “They might”, Wright replied adding mysteriously: “I spent a lot of time in Northern Ireland, you know. But I won’t reveal anything about that. Malcolm, it would be easy for me to make this book very sensational indeed”.

Wright had also cautioned Turnbull that: “I may never be able to tell you the truth about some things”. When Turnbull asked him what he meant, Wright responded: “My work in Northern Ireland, for example. Satellite surveillance. A lot of things. This is a safe book compared to what I could write”.

Wright had retired from MI5 in 1976 a disgruntled man. He and his wife Lois emigrated to Australia to live near one of their daughters, Jennifer, in Tasmania to raise horses. By the 1980s he had decided to put his pen into some ink.

Wright had diabetes, and was frail and generally in poor health. Before the Australian courtroom drama began, Turnbull visited London where he met a senior legal figure acting on behalf of HMG. Turnbull’s arm was seized by the lawyer and held in a “hard” grip. “Well you tell [Wright] from me”, the lawyer said “that he’d better seek some medical advice before he comes to court. He’ll get no quarter in the witness box on account of his ill-health”. While this was clearly not a death threat, if this was how the occupant of one of HMG’s loftiest legal perches was prepared to conduct himself, what was to be expected from the gangsters in MI5? Wright had participated in at least one – if not multiple – MI5 assassination operations and knew perfectly well what its cutthroats were capable of. It probably crossed his mind that given half the chance they might, for example, arrange a road-traffic accident along a dusty Tasmanian dirt track. To avoid this, he took out a life assurance policy, one that involved a threat to reveal his unpublished secrets if he was murdered.

The legal wrangling dragged on for another year. On 14 June 1988, while an injunction restraining British newspapers from publishing the contents of the book was crumbling in the House of Lords in London, Wright made his threat public: “There are 10 major stories which I have not put in [‘Spycatcher’] and there are probably others if I thought about it. I may put them into a secret report or I may do nothing. I just haven’t thought it out yet”. The next day, The Times reported that HMG had “always been aware that Mr Wright knew a lot more than he revealed in ‘Spycatcher’, particularly concerning his service as an MI5 officer in Northern Ireland”.

From his home in Australia, Wright buoyed the story by proclaiming that the real reason HMG had gone to such lengths to muzzle him was “because of the other things I know. But I said in the beginning I wouldn’t publish them and I haven’t done it. They have always been frightened of what I know…”. Just in case the message wasn’t clear, he told the BBC that his future course of action would depend on how HMG “behaved themselves”.

‘Spycatcher’ became an international bestseller shifting over two million copies and earned Wright a fortune. His ghostwriter, Paul Greengrass, went on to great success as a film director. His credits include the Jason Bourne film series.

After his publishing success, Wright retreated into virtual seclusion on his small farm near the apple-growing centre of Cygnet, at least for a while. Whereas he had once courted the media, requests for interviews were now batted out-of-court by his wife Lois. “Sorry. He won’t talk to journalists or anyone else like that”, she was quoted as saying. “He has nothing left to say”.

But he had plenty left to say, albeit that some of it was utterly innocuous. On 12 August 1990 the Sunday Times reported that he was writing another book provisionally entitled ‘Tomorrow Is Another Day’ about “a tamer topic that should unsettle no government”, the rearing of pedigree animals. But at least the proposed publication provided Wright with an opportunity to remind HMG to behave itself. “Peter does talk occasionally about writing down some post-‘Spycatcher’ reflections, but I fear they may never come to fruition”, Sandy Grant, the managing director of Heinemann in Australia, was quoted as saying.

In 1991 he published a second spy book but it was a limp offering, little more than an A-Z of espionage terminology with a few stories thrown in for good measure. It was entitled the ‘Spycatcher’s encyclopedia of espionage’. There was, however, a hint in it at the Irish secrets he intended to carry to his grave if HMG behaved itself. “I spent a lot of time in Ireland”, he intoned, “and it was not pleasant. We also did a lot of things there which I am never going to talk about, because it would just cause more trouble”.

There is a possibility, albeit a wafer-thin one, that Wright may have eventually let Turnbull have a peep inside his box of secrets. In his book, Turnbull was able to describe how Wright “had been privy to some of the weightiest secrets of the free world, he had spied on presidents and prime ministers, he was at the very centre of the fight against the…IRA)”. Perhaps one day Turnbull will clarify what – if anything – he learnt about Wright’s activities in Ireland and whether he knows anything about a secret dossier.

By the 1960s Wright had become MI5’s Witchfinder General, a position he exploited to accumulate mountains of dossiers containing embarrassing secrets about the British establishment. During the incessant mole hunts Wright undertook, he was granted access to any file he required in his search for treachery, real or imagined. His meddlings ranged across universities, government departments – especially the foreign and Commonwealth Office and Home Office – Buckingham Palace, and anywhere else that took his fancy. He even interviewed Airey Neave MP, who had escaped from Colditz, about the political leanings of his fellow non-British prisoners. According to Wright, MI5’s D-G, roger Hollis, instructed “that I myself had to conduct any interview deemed sensitive, which normally meant it was with a lord, a knight, politician, top civil servant, or spy suspect”.

One of those Wright interrogated was the arch MI5 traitor, Sir Anthony Blunt. Blunt was prepared to betray many of his friends to preserve his position: “Blunt, too, loved to discuss the scandalous side of Cambridge life in the 1930s…I soon realised that the [Cambridge] ring of five stood at the centre of a series of other connecting rings, each pledged to silence, each anxious to protect secrets from outsiders. There was the secret ring of homosexuals, where loyalty to their kind overrode all other obligations; there was the secret world of the Apostles [a group of Cambridge intellectuals], where ties to fellow Apostles remain strong throughout life; and then there was the ring of those friends of Blunt and [Guy] Burgess who were not themselves spies, but who knew or guessed what was going on. each ring supported the others, and made the task of identifying the inner core that much more difficult”.4

“I had seen into the secret heart of the present establishment at a time when they had been young and careless. I knew their scandals and their intrigues. I knew too much, and they knew it”.

Wright personally interviewed and re-interviewed more than 100 people over a period of six years. By the end of it he could boast: “I had seen into the secret heart of the present establishment at a time when they had been young and careless. I knew their scandals and their intrigues. I knew too much, and they knew it”. One of these was the former PM Anthony Eden. All of this gave MI5 a power over the political establishment and provides one clue – among many – as to why successive governments have mangled their reputations by covering up the criminal activities of MI5.

The control of politicians by the darker elements of the civil service has not changed much in the intervening decades. David Cameron told the family of Patrick Finucane (the Belfast solicitor who had been assassinated by British agents in NI) that he could not order a public inquiry into the scandal. Finucane’s brother Martin asked him why. In a moment of candour Cameron turned to Mrs. Finucane and said: “look, the last administration couldn’t deliver an inquiry in your husband’s case and neither can we”. According to Cameron this was because “there are people all around this place, [10 Downing street], who won’t let it happen”. As he was saying this, he raised a finger and made a circular motion in the air.

What gave those ‘around’ Cameron such sway over his administration – not to mention that of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown? Theresa May was Home secretary at the time so there is no reason to suspect that anything has changed since she became PM.

By the early 1970s, Wright had clawed his way to the top of MI5’s greasy, bloodstained pole. He was close to its D-G, Sir Martin Furnival Jones. When Michael Hanley, the Deputy D-G of MI5 became D-G in 1972, he appointed Wright as his special adviser. Hanley asked Wright to formulate proposals about how MI5 should deal with NI after which he spent “a lot of time in Ireland” and did the mysterious things which would have caused “more trouble” if they were ever exposed. The Irish Times, Irish Independent and other mainstream publications never lifted a finger to follow up the tempting clues the old curmudgeon had laid out so publicly.

What Wright divulged in ‘Spycatcher’ was hair-raising enough. He described how he and an Irishman called Bill Magan had plotted to ‘neutralise’ General Grivas during Britain’s struggle against EOKA in Cyprus in the late 1950s; a treasonous plot against PM Harold Wilson; and wrongdoing by MI5’s blood brothers over at MI6. He described how at the start of the Suez Crisis, MI6 had “developed a plan, through the London station, to
assassinate [Egypt’s President] Nasser using nerve gas. [British PM Anthony] Eden initially gave his approval to the operation, but later rescinded it when he got agreement from the French and Israelis to engage in joint military action. When this course failed, and he was forced to withdraw [from Suez], Eden reactivated the assassination option a second time. By this time virtually all MI6 assets in Egypt had been rounded up by Nasser, and a new operation, using renegade Egyptian officers, was drawn up, but it failed lamentably, principally because the cache of weapons which had been hidden on the outskirts of Cairo was found to be defective”.

Had the nerve-gas plot proceeded, the collateral damage to Nasser’s secretarial and domestic staff, not to mention anyone happening to visit him, would have been devastating. The gas would have asphyxiated the victims while melting their vital organs. The gas MI6 had in mind to assassinate Nasser was undoubtedly developed by HMG’s team of Dr. Strangeloves at a ghoulish scientific complex known as Porton Down. Wright described how he once visited it for a demonstration of a cigarette packet which had been fitted with a poison tipped dart by the staff of the explosives Research and Development Establishment: “we solemnly put on white coats and were taken out to one of the animal compounds behind Porton by Dr. Ladell, the scientist there who handled all MI5 and MI6 work. A sheep on a lead was led into the centre of the ring. One flank had been shaved to reveal the coarse pink skin. Ladell’s assistant pulled out the cigarette packet and stepped forward. The sheep started, and was restrained by the lead, and I thought perhaps the device had misfired. But then the sheep’s knees began to buckle, and it started rolling its eyes and frothing at the mouth. Slowly the animal sank to the ground, life draining away, as the white-coated professionals discussed the advantages of the modern new toxin around the corpse”.

Peter Wright died a rich yet bitter man in 1995 at the age of 78. He had spent his declining years referring to Thatcher as a “bitch” and those around her as “those bastards”. Assuming he compiled a secret dossier, what happened to it? After the passage of three decades it is unlikely it will now surface. Instead Village will take a stab at what it might have contained. A sobering thought is that for every error we may make, the likelihood is that some other unreported horror story remains concealed. Before Wright’s began his interrogation of Blunt, he received a briefing from Michael Adeane, the Queen’s Private secretary, who told him: “from time to time you may find Blunt referring to an assignment he undertook on behalf of the Palace – a visit to Germany at the end of the war. Please do not pursue this matter. strictly speaking, it is not relevant to considerations of national security” (‘spycatcher’ p223). Wright was hardly going to deny MI5 an insight into this mystery since Blunt had undoubtedly passed details of it to his KGB handlers. The odds are high he learnt that Blunt had been sent to Germany to recover the correspondence the Duke of windsor had exchanged with the Nazi hierarchy after his abdication. revelation of this nature, even in 1987, still had the potential to shake the foundations of Buckingham Palace.

Last April Village described how in 1946 and 1947 MI6 ran an operation to disrupt the flow of Jewish refugees from Mediterranean ports to Palestine, codenamed Operation Embarrass. One of the MI6 unit was an Irishman, wing-Commander Derek Verschoyle. The first account of the Operation emerged in ‘The Friends’, a book about MI6 published by Nigel West in 1988, a year after ‘Spycatcher’. MI6 expert Dr. Stephen Dorrill dug up additional details which he published in 2000 revealing how one former MI6 officer had described it as the “blackest page in MI6’s postwar history” and that there had been persistent rumours that one unidentified ship packed with Holocaust survivors “may have been blown up at sea, whether by accident or design”. MI6 acknowledged the existence of the operation in 2010 when it let Professor Keith Jeffery of Queens University, Belfast, include an account of it in the official history of MI6 it had asked him to write. In fairness to MI6, it should be commended for the disclosure. It shows that not everyone in it is addicted to lies, deceit and cover-up and offers a glimmer of hope that it may be mending some of its ways. Any reformers should note too that MI6 survived the revelation without much condemnation. Time now to admit the Dublin bombings of 1972, perhaps?

Bizarrely, while Wright was prepared to admit that he had been involved in a plot to kill Colonel Grivas in Cyprus, he was coy about the sexual blackmail of the Colonel’s political ally, Archbishop Makarios. That operation was also exposed by Nigel West in 1988. Two years later no less a figure than Sir Dick White, the former head of both MI5 and MI6, confirmed that it had occurred. Wright and a colleague from MI6 had placed a listening device on the telephone lines leading to the Archbishop’s Palace in Cyprus. MI6 also had a number of agents inside it controlled by Sir Stephen Hastings MC, who later became a Conservative MP. Wright gave no hint that any of them had discovered that the Archbishop was engaged in homosexual relations, or that this information had been used to blackmail him. If he had, the revelation might have raised questions about Wright’s involvement in the sexual blackmail of MI5 targets in Ireland, where the British Army and MI5 had established brothels for adult heterosexuals, not to mention the blackmail of members of the Anglo-Irish paedophile vice ring which preyed on boys at Kincora and elsewhere, some of them as young as eight years of age. Wright hardly relished the thought that his daughters would discover that their beloved father had stood back while children were raped and driven to suicide so that MI5 could blackmail some of the participants in a wide range of paedophile rings.

Declassified CIA records confirm that President Eisenhower of the USA ordered the murder of Patrice Lumumba, PM of the Congo. Lumumba was killed in a joint CIA-MI6 operation in 1961. He had to endure a gruesome orgy of torture and violence that lasted for five or six hours before he finally expired. A harrowing account of it appears in the towering international bestseller, ‘The Devil’s Chessboard’ (2016), a biography of the egregiously evil Allen Dulles of the CIA. While the book focusses on the CIA’s involvement, MI6 played a significant part in it too, something Wright would have known about.

Howard Frank Trayton Smith, who served as Britain’s intelligence supremo in Northern Ireland, 1971-1972, was a pivotal figure in the murder. He later became Ambassador to Moscow and, in 1979, D-G of MI5. In 1960 Smith was a senior official at the Foreign Office with responsibility for the Congo. Daphne Park was serving as the MI6 Head of Station in the Congo. Park reported to Smith that Lumumba was allegedly trying to take his country into the Soviet camp. This was utter nonsense. Nonetheless, on 28 September, 1960, Smith circulated a memo to the Foreign Office where it was digested by a number of highly-placed powerbrokers including the future Prime Minister Ted Heath who was then a junior minister there. In it Smith nonchalantly explained he could see “only two possible solutions” to the situation: ‘The first is the simple one of ensuring Lumumba’s removal from the scene by killing him. This should in fact solve the problem, since so far as we can tell, Lumumba is not a leader of a movement within which there are potential successors of his quality and influence. His supporters are much less dangerous material”.

By the time Wright’s book was meandering towards the printing presses, Smith was a decorated and recently retired D-G of MI5: exactly the type of person HMG would instinctively rally to protect. Meanwhile, Daphne Park was deeply immersed in MI6’s Anglo-Irish machinations. she was a governor of the BBC (where she interfered with broadcasts about NI) and on the cusp of becoming a life peer. She was also a friend of the then serving Taoiseach Garret FitzGerald (through her management role in the British-Irish Association). MI6 could not afford to allow Wright to expose her part in Lumumba’s murder or other aspects of her sordid past: in the 1970s she had served as the Head of MI6’s Western Hemisphere division where – at a minimum – she had knowledge of the MI6-CIA Gladio death squads active in Europe at the time and had spread smears about Charles Haughey across the globe through MI6-CIA-controlled news agencies. Had she been exposed by Wright, a veritable can of Irish worms might have wriggled free just as Haughey was about to wrest power back from FitzGerald, and HMG was fearful about what he might do with the Hillsborough Agreement and security co-operation generally. Incidentally, Park remained an unapologetic colonialist. When she was interviewed by the Daily Telegraph in April 2003 she stated that the “The [British] Government is too worried about speaking out [against Mugabe] because they think they will be accused of being colonialist. Well I don’t think that’s such a terrible crime”. Before her death, Park also acknowledged that: “Yes, I have been involved in death, but I cannot speak about that”. Interested readers should purchase a copy of the fascinating ‘Queen of Spies’ (2015) by the Dublin writer and intelligence expert, Paddy Hayes. One of the more interesting quotes in it is that of John de St Jorre of MI6 who worked with Park in Leopoldville: “I always thought of Daphne as a blend of Margaret Rutherford, the bosomy and beloved actress, and Rosa Klebb, the cold-eyed KGB dragon-lady with a poisonous blade in her shoe”.

In January 1972 British paratroopers shot dead 13 unarmed civilians in Derry. HMG responded by building a pyramid of lies around the truth. A tribunal manipulated by Lord Widgery did the necessary. His fraudulent report was published in 1972, exculpating the paratroopers. Aside from a few gullible Colonel Blimps in the shires, no one believed a word of it. Decades later the Saville Inquiry managed to shine a light over much of the truth but was deflected by counterinsurgency guru, Brigadier Frank Kitson, and MI5, from the scandal’s deeper secrets. As someone who was responsible for the formulation of MI5’s NI policy in 1972, Wright cannot but have known all there was to know about Kitson and MI5’s role in Bloody Sunday. At the time of the ‘Spycatcher’ affair, Kitson was a doyen of the British establishment having retired as Commander-in-Chief of the United Kingdom land forces just two years previously.

Kitson is now 90 years of age. On 27 April 2015 he and the Ministry of Defence were served with papers for negligence and misfeasance in office by Mary Heenan, widow of Eugene Heenan, a fifty-year-old Catholic with five children who was murdered in 1973 by members of the UDA led by a British agent called Albert ‘Ginger’ Baker, because of “the use of loyalist paramilitary gangs to contain the republican-nationalist threat through terror, manipulation of the rule of law, infiltration and subversion all core to the Kitson military of doctrine endorsed by the British Army and the British government at the time”.

The republic of Ireland was virgin territory and a playground for the dirty tricksters of MI5 and MI6 in 1972. In December of that year they organised two car bombings in Dublin while the Offences Against the State Bill was limping towards its doom inside Leinster House. Many of the deputies in the Dáil who were opposed to the bill backed off after the explosions and it was ushered on to the statute books. The assumption at the time was that the bombs were the work of militant republicans, especially as there were protests in the city that night against the arrest of the Chief of Staff of the Provisional IRA, Seán MacStíofáin. Last December Village published an analysis of the atrocity. It highlighted the probable complicity of Kitson’s Military Reaction Force (MRF) in it. Moreover, in April, we reported how a former MI6 trainee had learnt that MI6 had been involved in the 1972 attack and that it had garnered a legendary status inside MI6. As the man formulating MI5’s policy on Ireland, it is inconceivable that Peter Wright did not know everything there was to know about the MRF and the 1972 Dublin bombings. If, as suspected, MI6 and the MRF was behind it, it would surely rank as one of Wright’s unpublished secrets.

In addition, he would have known the inside story of the Littlejohn affair during which the Littlejohn brothers petrol-bombed Garda stations in 1972 at the behest of MI6. The Littlejohns were caught and imprisoned in Mountjoy for a bank heist they executed on Grafton street in October 1972. They were released from prison early by Garret FitzGerald in 1981 on “humanitarian” grounds and are still alive.

Trump’s America (cont’d)….

October 1, 2017
By Joe Kloc

Weeks after a Category 4 hurricane made landfall in Puerto Rico, it was reported that 95 percent of residents on the island were without power, 35 percent of grocery stores were closed, 50 percent of roads needed to be cleared of debris, 86 percent of cellphone towers were not functioning, and 25 percent of shipping ports were closed. “We will get through this TOGETHER,” tweeted U.S. president Donald Trump, who then referred to Puerto Rican officials as “politically motivated ingrates” told by “the Democrats” to say “nasty” things. “They want everything to be done for them,” tweeted Trump, who has spent a fourth of his presidency visiting his private clubs at a cost to taxpayers of at least $70 million. Trump said he was “working night and day” to help Puerto Rico, and then handed out a trophy at a New Jersey golf course, which he arrived at after visiting a different New Jersey golf course. Trump, whose Trump International Golf Club in Puerto Rico filed for bankruptcy in 2015, tweeted that it “must be dealt with” that Puerto Rico “owed” billions of dollars “to Wall Street and banks,” and it was reported that Trump’s proposed cuts to the corporate tax rate would give the six largest U.S. banks a $6.4 billion increase in profits. The mayor of San Juan said that Puerto Rico was “dying” and that “something close to a genocide” would occur if federal assistance didn’t increase, a U.S. general toured the island and said it was “the worst” storm damage he’d “ever seen,” it was reported that the percentage of Puerto Ricans without drinking water increased to 55, and Trump announced that Puerto Rico was “getting better on a daily basis.” Trump told reporters “the results that we’ve had with respect to loss of life” were “incredible,” and it was reported that at least 16 people had been killed by the storm. The mayor of San Juan said Trump was “killing” Puerto Ricans with “inefficiency,” and Trump explained that Puerto Rico was an island surrounded by “big water.” Trump tweeted that the mayor of San Juan was showing “poor leadership”; that fans who booed football players for protesting the police killings of unarmed black men and women were showing “great anger”; that Iran had launched a ballistic missile “capable of reaching Israel,” which the country had not done; and that the secretary of state was “wasting his time” attempting to pursue talks with the government of North Korea, whom Trump has threatened to “totally destroy.” The White House clarified that Trump had not declared war on North Korea.